Skip to main content

Boat Harbour vs Voyager Point

Property investment comparison - Boat Harbour, NSW 2316 vs Voyager Point, NSW 2172

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Boat Harbour wins 1, Voyager Point wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBoat HarbourVoyager Point
Median house price$1.7M$1.7M
Median unit price-$1.3M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.51%3.40%
Gross rental yield (units)2.40%-
1-year house growth+7.7%estimate+8.3%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.9%0.8%
Population9931,678

Boat Harbour vs Voyager Point: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.7M in Boat Harbour and $1.7M in Voyager Point, so Boat Harbour is the cheaper entry point, with Voyager Point houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Voyager Point leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.40%, compared with 2.51% in Boat Harbour, a gap of 0.89 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.7% in Boat Harbour (an estimate) and +8.3% in Voyager Point (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Voyager Point, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Voyager Point and 1.9% in Boat Harbour, so landlords in Voyager Point face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Voyager Point is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,678 against 993, larger than Boat Harbour; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Voyager Point for rental income, Boat Harbour for a lower purchase price, Voyager Point for recent price momentum, Voyager Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison