Skip to main content

Bogangar vs Turrella

Property investment comparison - Bogangar, NSW 2488 vs Turrella, NSW 2205

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bogangar wins 3, Turrella wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBogangarTurrella
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$1.1M$850K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.27%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.38%-
1-year house growth+8.6%-5.7%
3-year house growth+28.7%+7.9%
Vacancy rate1.6%2.4%
Population3,3132,673

Bogangar vs Turrella: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.8M in Bogangar and $1.8M in Turrella.

For units, Bogangar sits at a median of $1.1M against $850K in Turrella, which makes Turrella the more affordable unit market and Bogangar the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.6% in Bogangar and -5.7% in Turrella, so recent momentum favours Bogangar, while Turrella went backwards.

Looking back three years, Bogangar houses are +28.7% and Turrella houses +7.9%, so Bogangar has compounded faster than Turrella over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Bogangar and 2.4% in Turrella, so landlords in Bogangar face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bogangar is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,313 against 2,673, larger than Turrella; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bogangar for recent price momentum, Bogangar for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison