Skip to main content

Bogangar vs Ultimo

Property investment comparison - Bogangar, NSW 2488 vs Ultimo, NSW 2007

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bogangar wins 2, Ultimo wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBogangarUltimo
Median house price$1.8M$1.7M
Median unit price$1.1M$705K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.27%3.17%
Gross rental yield (units)4.38%6.40%
1-year house growth+8.6%-8.9%estimate
3-year house growth+28.7%-
Vacancy rate1.6%1.6%
Population3,3137,410

Bogangar vs Ultimo: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Bogangar and $1.7M in Ultimo, so Ultimo is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Bogangar sits at a median of $1.1M against $705K in Ultimo, which makes Ultimo the more affordable unit market and Bogangar the pricier one.

On cash flow, Bogangar leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.27%, compared with 3.17% in Ultimo, a gap of 0.10 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.6% in Bogangar and -8.9% in Ultimo (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Bogangar, while Ultimo went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Ultimo and 1.6% in Bogangar, so landlords in Ultimo face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ultimo is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,410 against 3,313, roughly 2.2 times the size of Bogangar; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bogangar for rental income, Ultimo for a lower purchase price, Bogangar for recent price momentum, Ultimo for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison