Bolinda vs Kilsyth
Property investment comparison - Bolinda, VIC 3432 vs Kilsyth, VIC 3137
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bolinda wins 2, Kilsyth wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bolinda | Kilsyth |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $875K | $875K |
| Median unit price | $735K | $740K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.88% | 3.86% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.45% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +4.7%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | - | 1.7% |
| Population | 185 | 11,699 |
Bolinda vs Kilsyth: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $875K in Bolinda and $875K in Kilsyth.
For units, Bolinda sits at a median of $735K against $740K in Kilsyth, which makes Bolinda the more affordable unit market and Kilsyth the pricier one.
Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.88% in Bolinda and 3.86% in Kilsyth, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.
Kilsyth is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,699 against 185, roughly 63 times the size of Bolinda; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison