Skip to main content

Bombala vs Wentworth

Property investment comparison - Bombala, NSW 2632 vs Wentworth, NSW 2648

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bombala wins 1, Wentworth wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBombalaWentworth
Median house price$410K$410K
Median unit price$2.2M-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.84%5.49%
Gross rental yield (units)-6.46%
1-year house growth+9.0%estimate+9.4%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.5%1.8%
Population1,3721,577

Bombala vs Wentworth: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $410K in Bombala and $410K in Wentworth.

On cash flow, Wentworth leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.49%, compared with 4.84% in Bombala, a gap of 0.65 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.0% in Bombala (an estimate) and +9.4% in Wentworth (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Wentworth, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Bombala and 1.8% in Wentworth, so landlords in Bombala face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wentworth is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,577 against 1,372, larger than Bombala; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wentworth for rental income, Wentworth for recent price momentum, Bombala for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison