Bonn vs Mount Dandenong
Property investment comparison - Bonn, VIC 3561 vs Mount Dandenong, VIC 3767
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bonn wins 1, Mount Dandenong wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bonn | Mount Dandenong |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | - | $1.0M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.07% | 3.65% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | -1.0% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +25.6% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.7% | 3.7% |
| Population | 48 | 1,271 |
Bonn vs Mount Dandenong: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Bonn and $1.1M in Mount Dandenong.
On cash flow, Mount Dandenong leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.65%, compared with 2.07% in Bonn, a gap of 1.58 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.7% in Bonn and 3.7% in Mount Dandenong, so landlords in Bonn face less competition for tenants.
Mount Dandenong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,271 against 48, roughly 26 times the size of Bonn; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Mount Dandenong for rental income, Bonn for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Mount Dandenong, VIC 3767
Open Mount Dandenong suburb profileRecent sales in Mount Dandenong
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison