Skip to main content

Bonny Hills vs Croudace Bay

Property investment comparison - Bonny Hills, NSW 2445 vs Croudace Bay, NSW 2280

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bonny Hills wins 4, Croudace Bay wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBonny HillsCroudace Bay
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%3.30%
Gross rental yield (units)4.40%2.44%
1-year house growth+7.1%+4.9%estimate
3-year house growth+2.5%-
Vacancy rate1.0%2.6%
Population3,045641

Bonny Hills vs Croudace Bay: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Bonny Hills and $1.1M in Croudace Bay, so Bonny Hills is the cheaper entry point.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.30% in Bonny Hills and 3.30% in Croudace Bay, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.1% in Bonny Hills and +4.9% in Croudace Bay (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Bonny Hills, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Bonny Hills and 2.6% in Croudace Bay, so landlords in Bonny Hills face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bonny Hills is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,045 against 641, roughly 4.8 times the size of Croudace Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bonny Hills for a lower purchase price, Bonny Hills for recent price momentum, Bonny Hills for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison