Bonny Hills vs Dean Park
Property investment comparison - Bonny Hills, NSW 2445 vs Dean Park, NSW 2761
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bonny Hills wins 2, Dean Park wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bonny Hills | Dean Park |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.30% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.40% | 3.46% |
| 1-year house growth | +7.1% | +8.8% |
| 3-year house growth | +2.5% | +24.6% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.0% | 1.9% |
| Population | 3,045 | 3,180 |
Bonny Hills vs Dean Park: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Bonny Hills and $1.1M in Dean Park.
Over the past year house prices moved +7.1% in Bonny Hills and +8.8% in Dean Park, so recent momentum favours Dean Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Bonny Hills houses are +2.5% and Dean Park houses +24.6%, so Dean Park has compounded faster than Bonny Hills over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Bonny Hills and 1.9% in Dean Park, so landlords in Bonny Hills face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Dean Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,180 against 3,045, larger than Bonny Hills; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Dean Park for recent price momentum, Bonny Hills for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison