Bonython vs Queanbeyan
Property investment comparison - Bonython, ACT 2905 vs Queanbeyan, ACT 2620
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bonython wins 0, Queanbeyan wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bonython | Queanbeyan |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $960K | - |
| Median unit price | $745K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.97% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | +5.2% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +4.6% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.4% | 0.7% |
| Population | 3,839 | 45,604 |
Bonython vs Queanbeyan: what the numbers say
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Queanbeyan and 1.4% in Bonython, so landlords in Queanbeyan face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Queanbeyan is the bigger suburb, with a population of 45,604 against 3,839, roughly 12 times the size of Bonython; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Queanbeyan for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison