Skip to main content

Boonooroo vs Cosgrove

Property investment comparison - Boonooroo, QLD 4650 vs Cosgrove, QLD 4818

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Boonooroo wins 0, Cosgrove wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBoonoorooCosgrove
Median house price$685K$685K
Median unit price$515K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.46%4.50%
Gross rental yield (units)4.91%-
1-year house growth+9.3%+16.2%
3-year house growth+45.1%+69.8%
Vacancy rate2.1%1.5%
Population371665

Boonooroo vs Cosgrove: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $685K in Boonooroo and $685K in Cosgrove.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.46% in Boonooroo and 4.50% in Cosgrove, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.3% in Boonooroo and +16.2% in Cosgrove, so recent momentum favours Cosgrove, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Boonooroo houses are +45.1% and Cosgrove houses +69.8%, so Cosgrove has compounded faster than Boonooroo over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Cosgrove and 2.1% in Boonooroo, so landlords in Cosgrove face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Cosgrove is the bigger suburb, with a population of 665 against 371, larger than Boonooroo; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cosgrove for recent price momentum, Cosgrove for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison