Skip to main content

Booral vs Chatham

Property investment comparison - Booral, NSW 2425 vs Chatham, NSW 2430

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Booral wins 1, Chatham wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBooralChatham
Median house price$650K$645K
Median unit price$670K$400K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.44%4.52%
Gross rental yield (units)1.85%5.43%
1-year house growth+3.3%-10.7%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.9%1.3%
Population45736,841

Booral vs Chatham: what the numbers say

The median house price is $650K in Booral and $645K in Chatham, so Chatham is the cheaper entry point, with Booral houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Booral sits at a median of $670K against $400K in Chatham, which makes Chatham the more affordable unit market and Booral the pricier one.

On cash flow, Chatham leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.52%, compared with 4.44% in Booral, a gap of 0.08 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.3% in Booral and -10.7% in Chatham (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Booral, while Chatham went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Chatham and 2.9% in Booral, so landlords in Chatham face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Chatham is the bigger suburb, with a population of 36,841 against 457, roughly 81 times the size of Booral; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Chatham for rental income, Chatham for a lower purchase price, Booral for recent price momentum, Chatham for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison