Skip to main content

Boort vs Rushworth

Property investment comparison - Boort, VIC 3537 vs Rushworth, VIC 3612

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Boort wins 5, Rushworth wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBoortRushworth
Median house price$375K$370K
Median unit price-$310K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.56%5.33%
Gross rental yield (units)3.52%3.09%
1-year house growth+8.6%+5.8%
3-year house growth+38.9%-8.0%
Vacancy rate1.4%1.8%
Population9401,411

Boort vs Rushworth: what the numbers say

The median house price is $375K in Boort and $370K in Rushworth, so Rushworth is the cheaper entry point, with Boort houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Boort leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.56%, compared with 5.33% in Rushworth, a gap of 0.23 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.6% in Boort and +5.8% in Rushworth, so recent momentum favours Boort, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Boort houses are +38.9% and Rushworth houses -8.0%, so Boort has compounded faster than Rushworth over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Boort and 1.8% in Rushworth, so landlords in Boort face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Rushworth is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,411 against 940, larger than Boort; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Boort for rental income, Rushworth for a lower purchase price, Boort for recent price momentum, Boort for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison