Skip to main content

Boort vs Wedderburn

Property investment comparison - Boort, VIC 3537 vs Wedderburn, VIC 3518

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Boort wins 4, Wedderburn wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBoortWedderburn
Median house price$375K$350K
Median unit price-$395K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.56%4.98%
Gross rental yield (units)3.52%2.25%
1-year house growth+8.6%+23.1%
3-year house growth+38.9%+16.7%
Vacancy rate1.4%3.3%
Population940951

Boort vs Wedderburn: what the numbers say

The median house price is $375K in Boort and $350K in Wedderburn, so Wedderburn is the cheaper entry point, with Boort houses about 7% dearer.

On cash flow, Boort leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.56%, compared with 4.98% in Wedderburn, a gap of 0.58 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.6% in Boort and +23.1% in Wedderburn, so recent momentum favours Wedderburn, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Boort houses are +38.9% and Wedderburn houses +16.7%, so Boort has compounded faster than Wedderburn over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Boort and 3.3% in Wedderburn, so landlords in Boort face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wedderburn is the bigger suburb, with a population of 951 against 940, larger than Boort; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Boort for rental income, Wedderburn for a lower purchase price, Wedderburn for recent price momentum, Boort for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison