Skip to main content

Booval vs Southside

Property investment comparison - Booval, QLD 4304 vs Southside, QLD 4570

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Booval wins 3, Southside wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBoovalSouthside
Median house price$805K$800K
Median unit price$660K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.67%4.05%
Gross rental yield (units)3.79%-
1-year house growth+23.5%+13.8%
3-year house growth+62.8%+34.5%
Vacancy rate0.9%1.4%
Population2,7236,312

Booval vs Southside: what the numbers say

The median house price is $805K in Booval and $800K in Southside, so Southside is the cheaper entry point, with Booval houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Southside leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.05%, compared with 3.67% in Booval, a gap of 0.38 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +23.5% in Booval and +13.8% in Southside, so recent momentum favours Booval, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Booval houses are +62.8% and Southside houses +34.5%, so Booval has compounded faster than Southside over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Booval and 1.4% in Southside, so landlords in Booval face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Southside is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,312 against 2,723, roughly 2.3 times the size of Booval; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Southside for rental income, Southside for a lower purchase price, Booval for recent price momentum, Booval for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison