Boralma vs Montrose
Property investment comparison - Boralma, VIC 3682 vs Montrose, VIC 3765
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Boralma wins 0, Montrose wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Boralma | Montrose |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $980K | $980K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.63% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.52% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +2.9% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +15.8% |
| Vacancy rate | 6.2% | 0.3% |
| Population | 79 | 6,900 |
Boralma vs Montrose: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $980K in Boralma and $980K in Montrose.
Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Montrose and 6.2% in Boralma, so landlords in Montrose face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Montrose is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,900 against 79, roughly 87 times the size of Boralma; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Montrose for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison