Boulder vs Naturaliste
Property investment comparison - Boulder, WA 6432 vs Naturaliste, WA 6281
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Boulder wins 0, Naturaliste wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Boulder | Naturaliste |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $400K | $370K |
| Median unit price | $310K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 8.60% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | +15.7% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +31.3% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.1% | 1.6% |
| Population | 4,872 | 107 |
Boulder vs Naturaliste: what the numbers say
The median house price is $400K in Boulder and $370K in Naturaliste, so Naturaliste is the cheaper entry point, with Boulder houses about 8% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Naturaliste and 2.1% in Boulder, so landlords in Naturaliste face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Boulder is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,872 against 107, roughly 46 times the size of Naturaliste; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Naturaliste for a lower purchase price, Naturaliste for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison