Bowenfels vs Cougal
Property investment comparison - Bowenfels, NSW 2790 vs Cougal, NSW 2474
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bowenfels wins 3, Cougal wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bowenfels | Cougal |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $540K | $545K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.30% | 3.94% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.00% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +8.9% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +17.3% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.0% | 10.3% |
| Population | 2,049 | 30 |
Bowenfels vs Cougal: what the numbers say
The median house price is $540K in Bowenfels and $545K in Cougal, so Bowenfels is the cheaper entry point, with Cougal houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Bowenfels leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.30%, compared with 3.94% in Cougal, a gap of 0.36 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Bowenfels and 10.3% in Cougal, so landlords in Bowenfels face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Bowenfels is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,049 against 30, roughly 68 times the size of Cougal; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Bowenfels for rental income, Bowenfels for a lower purchase price, Bowenfels for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison