Boweya vs Caulfield
Property investment comparison - Boweya, VIC 3675 vs Caulfield, VIC 3162
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Boweya wins 2, Caulfield wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Boweya | Caulfield |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.9M | $1.9M |
| Median unit price | $430K | $810K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.00% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.07% | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | -6.9% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +5.8% |
| Vacancy rate | - | 2.5% |
| Population | 51 | 5,748 |
Boweya vs Caulfield: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.9M in Boweya and $1.9M in Caulfield, so Boweya is the cheaper entry point, with Caulfield houses about 1% dearer.
For units, Boweya sits at a median of $430K against $810K in Caulfield, which makes Boweya the more affordable unit market and Caulfield the pricier one.
Caulfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,748 against 51, roughly 113 times the size of Boweya; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Boweya for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison