Boweya vs McKinnon
Property investment comparison - Boweya, VIC 3675 vs McKinnon, VIC 3204
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Boweya wins 0, McKinnon wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Boweya | McKinnon |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.9M | $1.9M |
| Median unit price | $430K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 2.85% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.07% | 4.57% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +3.7% |
| 3-year house growth | - | -6.0% |
| Vacancy rate | - | 1.1% |
| Population | 51 | 6,878 |
Boweya vs McKinnon: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.9M in Boweya and $1.9M in McKinnon.
McKinnon is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,878 against 51, roughly 135 times the size of Boweya; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison