Skip to main content

Bowmans Forest vs Mount Martha

Property investment comparison - Bowmans Forest, VIC 3735 vs Mount Martha, VIC 3934

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bowmans Forest wins 1, Mount Martha wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBowmans ForestMount Martha
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$530K$810K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.32%
Gross rental yield (units)3.00%4.17%
1-year house growth--1.6%
3-year house growth--23.1%
Vacancy rate3.4%2.0%
Population10619,846

Bowmans Forest vs Mount Martha: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Bowmans Forest and $1.4M in Mount Martha, so Mount Martha is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Bowmans Forest sits at a median of $530K against $810K in Mount Martha, which makes Bowmans Forest the more affordable unit market and Mount Martha the pricier one.

Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Mount Martha and 3.4% in Bowmans Forest, so landlords in Mount Martha face less competition for tenants.

Mount Martha is the bigger suburb, with a population of 19,846 against 106, roughly 187 times the size of Bowmans Forest; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mount Martha for a lower purchase price, Mount Martha for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison