Skip to main content

Box Hill South vs Clarkefield

Property investment comparison - Box Hill South, VIC 3128 vs Clarkefield, VIC 3430

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Box Hill South wins 3, Clarkefield wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBox Hill SouthClarkefield
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price-$940K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.42%2.11%
Gross rental yield (units)3.86%3.70%
1-year house growth-0.1%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.4%4.7%
Population8,491303

Box Hill South vs Clarkefield: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.5M in Box Hill South and $1.5M in Clarkefield, so Clarkefield is the cheaper entry point, with Box Hill South houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Box Hill South leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.42%, compared with 2.11% in Clarkefield, a gap of 0.31 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Box Hill South and 4.7% in Clarkefield, so landlords in Box Hill South face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Box Hill South is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,491 against 303, roughly 28 times the size of Clarkefield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Box Hill South for rental income, Clarkefield for a lower purchase price, Box Hill South for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison