Skip to main content

Box Hill South vs Doncaster

Property investment comparison - Box Hill South, VIC 3128 vs Doncaster, VIC 3108

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Box Hill South wins 2, Doncaster wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBox Hill SouthDoncaster
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price-$650K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.42%2.70%
Gross rental yield (units)3.86%5.15%
1-year house growth-0.1%estimate+1.6%
3-year house growth--1.1%
Vacancy rate1.4%1.9%
Population8,49125,020

Box Hill South vs Doncaster: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.5M in Box Hill South and $1.5M in Doncaster, so Box Hill South is the cheaper entry point, with Doncaster houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Doncaster leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.70%, compared with 2.42% in Box Hill South, a gap of 0.28 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -0.1% in Box Hill South (an estimate) and +1.6% in Doncaster, so recent momentum favours Doncaster, while Box Hill South went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Box Hill South and 1.9% in Doncaster, so landlords in Box Hill South face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Doncaster is the bigger suburb, with a population of 25,020 against 8,491, roughly 2.9 times the size of Box Hill South; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Doncaster for rental income, Box Hill South for a lower purchase price, Doncaster for recent price momentum, Box Hill South for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison