Skip to main content

Brabham vs Woorree

Property investment comparison - Brabham, WA 6055 vs Woorree, WA 6530

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Brabham wins 2, Woorree wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBrabhamWoorree
Median house price$870K$870K
Median unit price-$415K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.77%3.66%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.20%
1-year house growth+19.9%+20.6%
3-year house growth+69.7%+61.7%
Vacancy rate3.4%1.0%
Population8,6651,295

Brabham vs Woorree: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $870K in Brabham and $870K in Woorree.

On cash flow, Brabham leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.77%, compared with 3.66% in Woorree, a gap of 1.11 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +19.9% in Brabham and +20.6% in Woorree, so recent momentum favours Woorree, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Brabham houses are +69.7% and Woorree houses +61.7%, so Brabham has compounded faster than Woorree over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Woorree and 3.4% in Brabham, so landlords in Woorree face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Brabham is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,665 against 1,295, roughly 7 times the size of Woorree; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Brabham for rental income, Woorree for recent price momentum, Woorree for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison