Skip to main content

Braemar vs St Andrews

Property investment comparison - Braemar, NSW 2575 vs St Andrews, NSW 2566

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Braemar wins 3, St Andrews wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBraemarSt Andrews
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.20%3.33%
Gross rental yield (units)4.35%3.41%
1-year house growth+2.5%estimate+8.6%
3-year house growth-+23.7%
Vacancy rate0.5%2.4%
Population9665,785

Braemar vs St Andrews: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.0M in Braemar and $1.0M in St Andrews.

On cash flow, Braemar leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.20%, compared with 3.33% in St Andrews, a gap of 0.87 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +2.5% in Braemar (an estimate) and +8.6% in St Andrews, so recent momentum favours St Andrews, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Braemar and 2.4% in St Andrews, so landlords in Braemar face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

St Andrews is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,785 against 966, roughly 6 times the size of Braemar; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Braemar for rental income, St Andrews for recent price momentum, Braemar for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison