Branxholme vs Maryborough
Property investment comparison - Branxholme, VIC 3302 vs Maryborough, VIC 3465
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Branxholme wins 0, Maryborough wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Branxholme | Maryborough |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $440K | $440K |
| Median unit price | - | $325K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.40% | 4.95% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.25% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +15.8% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +5.1% |
| Vacancy rate | 6.8% | 0.1% |
| Population | 304 | 8,160 |
Branxholme vs Maryborough: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $440K in Branxholme and $440K in Maryborough.
On cash flow, Maryborough leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.95%, compared with 4.40% in Branxholme, a gap of 0.55 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Maryborough and 6.8% in Branxholme, so landlords in Maryborough face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Maryborough is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,160 against 304, roughly 27 times the size of Branxholme; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Maryborough for rental income, Maryborough for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison