Skip to main content

Brassall vs Smithfield

Property investment comparison - Brassall, QLD 4305 vs Smithfield, QLD 4878

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Brassall wins 3, Smithfield wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBrassallSmithfield
Median house price$845K$845K
Median unit price-$410K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.70%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.80%7.83%
1-year house growth+17.5%+15.0%
3-year house growth+59.8%+35.6%
Vacancy rate1.1%1.2%
Population12,1156,664

Brassall vs Smithfield: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $845K in Brassall and $845K in Smithfield.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.5% in Brassall and +15.0% in Smithfield, so recent momentum favours Brassall, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Brassall houses are +59.8% and Smithfield houses +35.6%, so Brassall has compounded faster than Smithfield over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Brassall and 1.2% in Smithfield, so landlords in Brassall face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Brassall is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,115 against 6,664, larger than Smithfield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Brassall for recent price momentum, Brassall for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison