Brentwood vs Kalgup
Property investment comparison - Brentwood, WA 6153 vs Kalgup, WA 6280
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Brentwood wins 0, Kalgup wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Brentwood | Kalgup |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.5M | $1.5M |
| Median unit price | - | $575K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.91% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.55% | 6.79% |
| 1-year house growth | +15.0% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +74.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | 0.7% |
| Population | 2,153 | 91 |
Brentwood vs Kalgup: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.5M in Brentwood and $1.5M in Kalgup, so Kalgup is the cheaper entry point, with Brentwood houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Kalgup and 0.9% in Brentwood, so landlords in Kalgup face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Brentwood is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,153 against 91, roughly 24 times the size of Kalgup; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Kalgup for a lower purchase price, Kalgup for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison