Briar Hill vs Harmers Haven
Property investment comparison - Briar Hill, VIC 3088 vs Harmers Haven, VIC 3995
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Briar Hill wins 1, Harmers Haven wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Briar Hill | Harmers Haven |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.0M | $1.0M |
| Median unit price | $875K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.50% | 1.31% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.27% | - |
| 1-year house growth | -2.2% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -2.0% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.3% | 1.3% |
| Population | 3,220 | 62 |
Briar Hill vs Harmers Haven: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.0M in Briar Hill and $1.0M in Harmers Haven.
On cash flow, Briar Hill leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.50%, compared with 1.31% in Harmers Haven, a gap of 2.19 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.3%.
Briar Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,220 against 62, roughly 52 times the size of Harmers Haven; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Briar Hill for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison