Skip to main content

Bridgewater vs Milabena

Property investment comparison - Bridgewater, TAS 7030 vs Milabena, TAS 7325

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bridgewater wins 4, Milabena wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBridgewaterMilabena
Median house price$520K$525K
Median unit price$460K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.90%4.02%
Gross rental yield (units)5.50%-
1-year house growth+23.3%+4.9%
3-year house growth+10.6%-
Vacancy rate0.3%3.2%
Population4,59277

Bridgewater vs Milabena: what the numbers say

The median house price is $520K in Bridgewater and $525K in Milabena, so Bridgewater is the cheaper entry point, with Milabena houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Bridgewater leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.90%, compared with 4.02% in Milabena, a gap of 0.88 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +23.3% in Bridgewater and +4.9% in Milabena, so recent momentum favours Bridgewater, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Bridgewater and 3.2% in Milabena, so landlords in Bridgewater face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bridgewater is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,592 against 77, roughly 60 times the size of Milabena; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bridgewater for rental income, Bridgewater for a lower purchase price, Bridgewater for recent price momentum, Bridgewater for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison