Bridgewater vs Darley
Property investment comparison - Bridgewater, VIC 3516 vs Darley, VIC 3340
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bridgewater wins 1, Darley wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bridgewater | Darley |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $665K | $665K |
| Median unit price | - | $430K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.03% | 3.91% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.20% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +2.6% |
| 3-year house growth | - | -5.9% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.8% | 1.8% |
| Population | 133 | 9,190 |
Bridgewater vs Darley: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $665K in Bridgewater and $665K in Darley.
On cash flow, Darley leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.91%, compared with 3.03% in Bridgewater, a gap of 0.88 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Bridgewater and 1.8% in Darley, so landlords in Bridgewater face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Darley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,190 against 133, roughly 69 times the size of Bridgewater; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Darley for rental income, Bridgewater for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison