Bridport vs Carlton
Property investment comparison - Bridport, TAS 7262 vs Carlton, TAS 7173
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bridport wins 0, Carlton wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bridport | Carlton |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $690K | $690K |
| Median unit price | - | $1.2M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.10% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.73% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +9.1% | +20.2%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | -0.7% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 0.9% |
| Population | 1,742 | 1,363 |
Bridport vs Carlton: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $690K in Bridport and $690K in Carlton.
Over the past year house prices moved +9.1% in Bridport and +20.2% in Carlton (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Carlton, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Carlton and 1.1% in Bridport, so landlords in Carlton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Bridport is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,742 against 1,363, larger than Carlton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Carlton for recent price momentum, Carlton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison