Skip to main content

Bridport vs Upper Stowport

Property investment comparison - Bridport, TAS 7262 vs Upper Stowport, TAS 7321

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bridport wins 1, Upper Stowport wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBridportUpper Stowport
Median house price$690K$690K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.10%4.40%
Gross rental yield (units)3.73%-
1-year house growth+9.1%-
3-year house growth-0.7%-
Vacancy rate1.1%2.0%
Population1,74299

Bridport vs Upper Stowport: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $690K in Bridport and $690K in Upper Stowport.

On cash flow, Upper Stowport leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.40%, compared with 4.10% in Bridport, a gap of 0.30 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Bridport and 2.0% in Upper Stowport, so landlords in Bridport face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bridport is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,742 against 99, roughly 18 times the size of Upper Stowport; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Upper Stowport for rental income, Bridport for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison