Brighton vs Diamond Head
Property investment comparison - Brighton, QLD 4017 vs Diamond Head, QLD 4551
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Brighton wins 1, Diamond Head wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Brighton | Diamond Head |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.3M | $1.3M |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.10% | 3.78% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.24% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +15.5%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 5.3% |
| Population | 9,664 | - |
Brighton vs Diamond Head: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Brighton and $1.3M in Diamond Head.
On cash flow, Diamond Head leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.78%, compared with 3.10% in Brighton, a gap of 0.68 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Brighton and 5.3% in Diamond Head, so landlords in Brighton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
In short: Diamond Head for rental income, Brighton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison