Skip to main content

Brightwaters vs Waratah

Property investment comparison - Brightwaters, NSW 2264 vs Waratah, NSW 2298

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Brightwaters wins 1, Waratah wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBrightwatersWaratah
Median house price$975K$975K
Median unit price$585K$735K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.79%
Gross rental yield (units)4.99%-
1-year house growth+5.4%+7.3%
3-year house growth+17.0%+23.1%
Vacancy rate3.0%0.8%
Population8754,927

Brightwaters vs Waratah: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $975K in Brightwaters and $975K in Waratah.

For units, Brightwaters sits at a median of $585K against $735K in Waratah, which makes Brightwaters the more affordable unit market and Waratah the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.4% in Brightwaters and +7.3% in Waratah, so recent momentum favours Waratah, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Brightwaters houses are +17.0% and Waratah houses +23.1%, so Waratah has compounded faster than Brightwaters over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Waratah and 3.0% in Brightwaters, so landlords in Waratah face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Waratah is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,927 against 875, roughly 6 times the size of Brightwaters; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Waratah for recent price momentum, Waratah for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison