Skip to main content

Broadford vs Thomson

Property investment comparison - Broadford, VIC 3658 vs Thomson, VIC 3219

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Broadford wins 2, Thomson wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBroadfordThomson
Median house price$610K$610K
Median unit price-$520K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.34%4.05%
Gross rental yield (units)4.54%4.25%
1-year house growth+5.0%+12.0%estimate
3-year house growth+7.1%-
Vacancy rate1.2%0.8%
Population4,5921,606

Broadford vs Thomson: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $610K in Broadford and $610K in Thomson.

On cash flow, Broadford leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.34%, compared with 4.05% in Thomson, a gap of 0.29 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.0% in Broadford and +12.0% in Thomson (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Thomson, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Thomson and 1.2% in Broadford, so landlords in Thomson face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Broadford is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,592 against 1,606, roughly 2.9 times the size of Thomson; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Broadford for rental income, Thomson for recent price momentum, Thomson for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison