Skip to main content

Brooklyn vs Kingsbury

Property investment comparison - Brooklyn, VIC 3012 vs Kingsbury, VIC 3083

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Brooklyn wins 1, Kingsbury wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBrooklynKingsbury
Median house price$875K$870K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.55%3.34%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.88%
1-year house growth-0.8%estimate+6.6%
3-year house growth-+8.9%
Vacancy rate0.8%0.5%
Population1,9793,460

Brooklyn vs Kingsbury: what the numbers say

The median house price is $875K in Brooklyn and $870K in Kingsbury, so Kingsbury is the cheaper entry point, with Brooklyn houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Brooklyn leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.55%, compared with 3.34% in Kingsbury, a gap of 0.21 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -0.8% in Brooklyn (an estimate) and +6.6% in Kingsbury, so recent momentum favours Kingsbury, while Brooklyn went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Kingsbury and 0.8% in Brooklyn, so landlords in Kingsbury face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kingsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,460 against 1,979, larger than Brooklyn; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Brooklyn for rental income, Kingsbury for a lower purchase price, Kingsbury for recent price momentum, Kingsbury for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison