Broomfield vs Horsham
Property investment comparison - Broomfield, VIC 3364 vs Horsham, VIC 3400
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Broomfield wins 0, Horsham wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Broomfield | Horsham |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $480K | $475K |
| Median unit price | - | $400K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 5.00% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.10% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +18.1% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +17.5% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.7% | 0.1% |
| Population | 213 | 15,134 |
Broomfield vs Horsham: what the numbers say
The median house price is $480K in Broomfield and $475K in Horsham, so Horsham is the cheaper entry point, with Broomfield houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Horsham and 1.7% in Broomfield, so landlords in Horsham face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Horsham is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,134 against 213, roughly 71 times the size of Broomfield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Horsham for a lower purchase price, Horsham for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison