Broughton vs Lake Boga
Property investment comparison - Broughton, VIC 3418 vs Lake Boga, VIC 3584
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Broughton wins 1, Lake Boga wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Broughton | Lake Boga |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $370K | $370K |
| Median unit price | - | $415K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.45% | 5.83% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.87% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +7.9%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.1% | 1.1% |
| Population | 65 | 982 |
Broughton vs Lake Boga: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $370K in Broughton and $370K in Lake Boga.
On cash flow, Lake Boga leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.83%, compared with 5.45% in Broughton, a gap of 0.38 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Broughton and 1.1% in Lake Boga, so landlords in Broughton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Lake Boga is the bigger suburb, with a population of 982 against 65, roughly 15 times the size of Broughton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Lake Boga for rental income, Broughton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison