Broughton vs Rushworth
Property investment comparison - Broughton, VIC 3418 vs Rushworth, VIC 3612
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Broughton wins 2, Rushworth wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Broughton | Rushworth |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $370K | $370K |
| Median unit price | - | $310K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.45% | 5.33% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.09% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +5.8% |
| 3-year house growth | - | -8.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.1% | 1.8% |
| Population | 65 | 1,411 |
Broughton vs Rushworth: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $370K in Broughton and $370K in Rushworth.
On cash flow, Broughton leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.45%, compared with 5.33% in Rushworth, a gap of 0.12 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Broughton and 1.8% in Rushworth, so landlords in Broughton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Rushworth is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,411 against 65, roughly 22 times the size of Broughton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Broughton for rental income, Broughton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison