Skip to main content

Brunswick West vs Seaholme

Property investment comparison - Brunswick West, VIC 3055 vs Seaholme, VIC 3018

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Brunswick West wins 1, Seaholme wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBrunswick WestSeaholme
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.63%
Gross rental yield (units)-2.92%
1-year house growth+1.9%estimate+2.2%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.7%1.9%
Population14,7462,067

Brunswick West vs Seaholme: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Brunswick West and $1.3M in Seaholme.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.9% in Brunswick West (an estimate) and +2.2% in Seaholme (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Seaholme, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Brunswick West and 1.9% in Seaholme, so landlords in Brunswick West face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Brunswick West is the bigger suburb, with a population of 14,746 against 2,067, roughly 7 times the size of Seaholme; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Seaholme for recent price momentum, Brunswick West for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison