Skip to main content

Bucca vs Marayong

Property investment comparison - Bucca, NSW 2450 vs Marayong, NSW 2148

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bucca wins 4, Marayong wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBuccaMarayong
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$570K$840K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.93%
Gross rental yield (units)5.33%3.52%
1-year house growth+10.5%+3.6%
3-year house growth+16.0%+16.6%
Vacancy rate1.9%1.2%
Population6147,834

Bucca vs Marayong: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Bucca and $1.1M in Marayong, so Bucca is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Bucca sits at a median of $570K against $840K in Marayong, which makes Bucca the more affordable unit market and Marayong the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.5% in Bucca and +3.6% in Marayong, so recent momentum favours Bucca, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Bucca houses are +16.0% and Marayong houses +16.6%, so Marayong has compounded faster than Bucca over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Marayong and 1.9% in Bucca, so landlords in Marayong face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Marayong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,834 against 614, roughly 13 times the size of Bucca; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bucca for a lower purchase price, Bucca for recent price momentum, Marayong for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison