Buchan South vs Redan
Property investment comparison - Buchan South, VIC 3885 vs Redan, VIC 3350
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Buchan South wins 1, Redan wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Buchan South | Redan |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $510K | $510K |
| Median unit price | $190K | $380K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 4.10% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.51% | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +16.4% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +5.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.9% | 0.9% |
| Population | 102 | 3,000 |
Buchan South vs Redan: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $510K in Buchan South and $510K in Redan.
For units, Buchan South sits at a median of $190K against $380K in Redan, which makes Buchan South the more affordable unit market and Redan the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Redan and 2.9% in Buchan South, so landlords in Redan face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Redan is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,000 against 102, roughly 29 times the size of Buchan South; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Redan for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison