Skip to main content

Buchanan vs Summerland Point

Property investment comparison - Buchanan, NSW 2323 vs Summerland Point, NSW 2259

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Buchanan wins 3, Summerland Point wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBuchananSummerland Point
Median house price$900K$900K
Median unit price$540K$580K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.99%3.60%
Gross rental yield (units)5.48%-
1-year house growth-+13.5%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.9%2.9%
Population2122,708

Buchanan vs Summerland Point: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $900K in Buchanan and $900K in Summerland Point.

For units, Buchanan sits at a median of $540K against $580K in Summerland Point, which makes Buchanan the more affordable unit market and Summerland Point the pricier one.

On cash flow, Buchanan leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.99%, compared with 3.60% in Summerland Point, a gap of 0.39 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Buchanan and 2.9% in Summerland Point, so landlords in Buchanan face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Summerland Point is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,708 against 212, roughly 13 times the size of Buchanan; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Buchanan for rental income, Buchanan for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison