Skip to main content

Buckland Park vs Nailsworth

Property investment comparison - Buckland Park, SA 5120 vs Nailsworth, SA 5083

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Buckland Park wins 2, Nailsworth wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBuckland ParkNailsworth
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price-$650K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.63%2.44%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.40%
1-year house growth+8.3%+9.2%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate6.1%1.9%
Population992,235

Buckland Park vs Nailsworth: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Buckland Park and $1.4M in Nailsworth, so Buckland Park is the cheaper entry point, with Nailsworth houses about 4% dearer.

On cash flow, Buckland Park leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.63%, compared with 2.44% in Nailsworth, a gap of 0.19 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.3% in Buckland Park and +9.2% in Nailsworth (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Nailsworth, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Nailsworth and 6.1% in Buckland Park, so landlords in Nailsworth face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Nailsworth is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,235 against 99, roughly 23 times the size of Buckland Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Buckland Park for rental income, Buckland Park for a lower purchase price, Nailsworth for recent price momentum, Nailsworth for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison