Budgong vs Bungendore
Property investment comparison - Budgong, NSW 2577 vs Bungendore, NSW 2621
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Budgong wins 2, Bungendore wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Budgong | Bungendore |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | $645K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 3.78% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.57% | 4.98% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +1.4% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +4.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.9% | 1.6% |
| Population | 87 | 4,745 |
Budgong vs Bungendore: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.1M in Budgong and $1.1M in Bungendore, so Bungendore is the cheaper entry point.
On cash flow, Budgong leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 3.78% in Bungendore, a gap of 0.20 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Bungendore and 1.9% in Budgong, so landlords in Bungendore face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Bungendore is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,745 against 87, roughly 55 times the size of Budgong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Budgong for rental income, Bungendore for a lower purchase price, Bungendore for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison