Skip to main content

Budgong vs Plumpton

Property investment comparison - Budgong, NSW 2577 vs Plumpton, NSW 2761

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Budgong wins 2, Plumpton wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBudgongPlumpton
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$645K$825K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.98%3.14%
Gross rental yield (units)5.57%-
1-year house growth-+9.4%
3-year house growth-+27.6%
Vacancy rate1.9%1.6%
Population8710,070

Budgong vs Plumpton: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Budgong and $1.1M in Plumpton.

For units, Budgong sits at a median of $645K against $825K in Plumpton, which makes Budgong the more affordable unit market and Plumpton the pricier one.

On cash flow, Budgong leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 3.14% in Plumpton, a gap of 0.84 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Plumpton and 1.9% in Budgong, so landlords in Plumpton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Plumpton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,070 against 87, roughly 116 times the size of Budgong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Budgong for rental income, Plumpton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison