Skip to main content

Buff Point vs Largs

Property investment comparison - Buff Point, NSW 2262 vs Largs, NSW 2320

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Buff Point wins 3, Largs wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBuff PointLargs
Median house price$880K$880K
Median unit price$570K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.80%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.76%4.18%
1-year house growth+9.7%+5.5%
3-year house growth+15.3%+2.0%
Vacancy rate1.7%1.4%
Population3,5591,962

Buff Point vs Largs: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $880K in Buff Point and $880K in Largs.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.7% in Buff Point and +5.5% in Largs, so recent momentum favours Buff Point, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Buff Point houses are +15.3% and Largs houses +2.0%, so Buff Point has compounded faster than Largs over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Largs and 1.7% in Buff Point, so landlords in Largs face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Buff Point is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,559 against 1,962, larger than Largs; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Buff Point for recent price momentum, Largs for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison