Buffalo vs North Wonthaggi
Property investment comparison - Buffalo, VIC 3958 vs North Wonthaggi, VIC 3995
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Buffalo wins 0, North Wonthaggi wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Buffalo | North Wonthaggi |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $615K | $610K |
| Median unit price | $990K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 4.49% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.02% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +1.6% |
| 3-year house growth | - | -5.6% |
| Vacancy rate | 3.5% | 0.6% |
| Population | 284 | 3,475 |
Buffalo vs North Wonthaggi: what the numbers say
The median house price is $615K in Buffalo and $610K in North Wonthaggi, so North Wonthaggi is the cheaper entry point, with Buffalo houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 0.6% in North Wonthaggi and 3.5% in Buffalo, so landlords in North Wonthaggi face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
North Wonthaggi is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,475 against 284, roughly 12 times the size of Buffalo; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: North Wonthaggi for a lower purchase price, North Wonthaggi for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
North Wonthaggi, VIC 3995
Open North Wonthaggi suburb profileRecent sales in North Wonthaggi
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison