Skip to main content

Bundaberg East vs Kin Kora

Property investment comparison - Bundaberg East, QLD 4670 vs Kin Kora, QLD 4680

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bundaberg East wins 1, Kin Kora wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBundaberg EastKin Kora
Median house price$590K$590K
Median unit price-$425K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.00%5.02%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.34%
1-year house growth+12.0%+14.8%estimate
3-year house growth+56.1%-
Vacancy rate0.6%3.5%
Population2,8392,396

Bundaberg East vs Kin Kora: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $590K in Bundaberg East and $590K in Kin Kora.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 5.00% in Bundaberg East and 5.02% in Kin Kora, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.0% in Bundaberg East and +14.8% in Kin Kora (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Kin Kora, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Bundaberg East and 3.5% in Kin Kora, so landlords in Bundaberg East face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bundaberg East is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,839 against 2,396, larger than Kin Kora; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kin Kora for recent price momentum, Bundaberg East for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison