Skip to main content

Bundalong vs Edi Upper

Property investment comparison - Bundalong, VIC 3730 vs Edi Upper, VIC 3678

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bundalong wins 2, Edi Upper wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBundalongEdi Upper
Median house price$830K$830K
Median unit price$525K$515K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.45%4.64%
Gross rental yield (units)3.77%2.45%
1-year house growth+6.1%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.1%3.1%
Population512109

Bundalong vs Edi Upper: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $830K in Bundalong and $830K in Edi Upper.

For units, Bundalong sits at a median of $525K against $515K in Edi Upper, which makes Edi Upper the more affordable unit market and Bundalong the pricier one.

On cash flow, Edi Upper leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.64%, compared with 3.45% in Bundalong, a gap of 1.19 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Bundalong and 3.1% in Edi Upper, so landlords in Bundalong face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bundalong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 512 against 109, roughly 4.7 times the size of Edi Upper; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Edi Upper for rental income, Bundalong for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison